The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has criticised the Tinubu administration’s plan to reintegrate nearly 800 former terrorists into communities, describing it as a sign the government is “soft on terror” and lacks a clear security strategy.
- +ADC faults terrorists reintegration plan
In a statement by Bolaji Abdullahi, its National Publicity Secretary, on Sunday, the party argued that portraying insurgents as “brothers” or “prodigal sons,” alongside the reintegration plan, reflects a troubling misreading of terrorism as a threat.
In a statement by Bolaji Abdullahi, its National Publicity Secretary, on Sunday, the party argued that portraying insurgents as “brothers” or “prodigal sons,” alongside the reintegration plan, reflects a troubling misreading of terrorism as a threat.
The federal government has announced that 744 former terrorists and victims of violent extremism are to be reintegrated into society following their graduation from the Federal Government’s De-radicalisation, Rehabilitation and Reintegration Camp under Operation Safe Corridor.
But the ADC warned that any reintegration effort without clear accountability and justice for victims risks encouraging further violence.
The ADC stressed that terrorism is a coordinated campaign against the Nigerian state, not a moral issue that can be softened with language or sentiment.
According to the party, policies that appear to prioritise rehabilitation over accountability send the wrong message and undermine justice for victims.
It further described the government’s approach as inconsistent, noting that while authorities claim to be fighting terrorism, they are also considering reintroducing former insurgents into society without transparent processes or safeguards.
The party raised concerns over the lack of clarity on investigations, prosecutions, and the criteria for determining those eligible for reintegration. It also questioned the absence of monitoring systems and community consultations.
Reaffirming its position, the ADC said terrorism must be treated as an existential threat, insisting that offenders should face the full weight of the law while prioritising the safety and rights of victims.
