Man produces sperm from testicular tissue frozen as a child in breakthrough trial
In a groundbreaking fertility trial, a man whose testicular tissue was frozen before he underwent chemotherapy as a child to be re-transplanted 16 years later has been able to produce sperm.
In a groundbreaking fertility trial, a man whose testicular tissue was frozen before he underwent chemotherapy as a child to be re-transplanted 16 years later has been able to produce sperm.
It is the first time a transplant of cryopreserved prepubertal testicular tissue has been demonstrated to restore sperm production in an adult patient. The 27-year-old man had the sample frozen when he was 10, before undergoing potent chemotherapy as part of treatment for sickle cell disease.
“This is a huge finding,” said Prof Ellen Goossens, of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, who led the trial. “Many more people will have hope that they can have biological children. It’s great to see for the patients for whom we already have tissue banked.”
Treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy can be life-saving for childhood cancer and sickle cell patients – but can also leave them infertile. After puberty, it is possible to preserve male patients’ sperm to use later in IVF, but this is not an option for prepubescent boys.
In 2002, the Belgian clinic became the first to start banking testicular tissue of prepubertal patients. The immature testes contain spermatogonial stem cells – the precursors of sperm – and sertoli cells, essential “nurse” cells that support and nourish developing sperm.
“At that time this field was in its infancy,” said Goossens. “These methods were just being developed in animals. We told patients’ families we couldn’t guarantee that the fertility restoration would be successful.”
The clinic’s first wave of patients are now reaching their mid-20s and some have reached the point of wanting to start a family, including the first patient to have tissue re-transplanted. To treat his sickle cell disease, he had received high-dose chemotherapy in 2008 to wipe out his own blood cells before undergoing a bone marrow transplant. Before the treatment, the clinic surgically removed one testicle, segmented it into small pieces and froze the tissue.
Last year, four tissue fragments were grafted back into the remaining testicle and four under the skin of the scrotum. After a year inside the body, the grafts were removed and analysed in the laboratory. The results are published in a preprint paper, which is yet to be peer reviewed.
Two of the grafts from inside the testicle had produced mature sperm, which was collected and frozen. Because the tissue fragments are not directly connected to the sperm duct, the researchers do not expect sperm cells to naturally find their way into the semen.
“The sperm that was isolated looked normal,” said Goossens. “We still have to see whether it’s able to fertilise an egg.”
Prof Rod Mitchell, a paediatric endocrinologist, is running a similar trial at the Centre for Reproductive Health at University of Edinburgh, which began banking testicular tissue in 2014 and, together with colleagues in Oxford and London, have samples cryopreserved for more than 1,000 UK patients in the UK.
He said: “There is now proof of principle in humans that this approach is going to work, which is amazing.” Mitchell expects his clinic to carry out the first transplants imminently.
“I always believed it would work,” he said. “If you freeze tissue and keep cells alive, then they should have the potential. You’re putting the tissue back into the perfect environment to stimulate it. Scientifically and biologically it makes sense. In reality, it’s still amazing.”
More than 3,000 patients worldwide already have testicular tissue banked. In the UK, it is estimated that about 200 patients each year would be likely to benefit.
Mitchell added: “We’re at a point where, internationally, we’ve been working on this for 15 years – in some cases more. It’s all been about collecting tissue from the boys. Now it’s coming to fruition. We’re all super excited about it.
“One of the things we want to make sure is that people know about this. We know that we’re not necessarily reaching all of them.”
The first patient is considering whether to undergo a second round of grafts with the aim of collecting more sperm, or whether to proceed with IVF in the near future.
