Bondi beach gunmen shot 11 people within 30 seconds of opening fire, royal commission hears

Bondi beach gunmen shot 11 people within 30 seconds of opening fire, royal commission hears

The second block of public hearings opened in Sydney on Monday morning, taking evidence about what was known about the two shooters.

On the evening of 14 December, two gunmen, Sajid Akram and his son Naveed, allegedly opened fire from a footbridge above Archer Park at Bondi beach, firing at a beachside Hanukah celebration being held for the local Jewish community.

Fifteen people were killed by the gunmen. Sajid Akram was shot dead by police; Naveed was shot and wounded and is in custody facing charges, including 15 counts of murder and one count of committing a terrorist act that investigators allege may have been “inspired by” Islamic State.

Counsel assisting, Richard Lancaster SC, told the commission the evidence will demonstrate a number of facts about the 14 December attack.

A Jewish organisation, the Community Security Group, asked NSW police to provide a static police presence at the Chanukah by the Sea event for the entirety of the celebration.

NSW police declined to provide a static police presence for the entire event, instead allocating a “mobile tasking, that is police officers were instructed to attend the event from time to time during the evening”.

At the time the two gunmen opened fire on Jewish community members, there were four police at Archer Park.

Within 29 seconds of the start of the shooting, 11 people had been shot, 10 of them fatally.

Three police officers were shot and injured in the court of the attack.

Within five minutes, there were 11 police officers on the scene.

The first shooter was shot and killed and the second shooter was shot and apprehended within seven minutes and 41 seconds after the start of the shooting.

Lancaster said there was no specific intelligence that the beachside Hanukah celebration would be the target of an attack.

“There is no evidence that any intelligence agency or law enforcement agency had any actual knowledge or specific information to suggest that there might be an armed attack on the Hanukah celebration at Bondi on 14 December 2025.

“In that sense it was a surprise attack.”

The Asio director general, Mike Burgess, told the commission on Monday morning that while Asio’s funding had been increased in recent years, the proportion of that funding dedicated towards counter-terrorism had decreased, in favour of resources – including Asio staff – being reallocated from counter-terrorism to foreign interference and espionage.

Burgess was asked directly whether, in retrospect, he considered “additional funding and resources would have put Asio in a better position to pursue its counter-terrorism activities over the last five years or so?”

“In retrospect, I still think that our resourcing was sufficient for the problems we face. Of course we are stretched, and I do have means by which I can ask for additional resources if we need to.”

Later, he was asked again if Asio was sufficiently resourced to counter a deteriorating security environment, in particular the increased risk of “lone actors” moved to violence without any prior warning or without coming to the notice of security agencies.

Lancaster asked: “If the threat level is growing and Asio can already be described as stretched in 2025, can the public be assured that Asio has sufficient resources and powers to respond to antisemitic conduct in the nature of a terrorist attack?”

Burgess responded: “I believe they can be assured that my agency puts its resources where it needs to, and if we have a resource issue I will ask government, and government will consider that through the budget process.”

The commission heard that while Asio had identified an “enduring threat to Jewish interests” in Australia, it had “no specific intelligence an attack was being planned” against Jews.

Burgess said Asio recognised the ongoing conflict in Gaza was “an emotive issue”, and that antisemitic incidents had increased since October 2023.

“We saw threatening, intimidating behaviour through [to] the end of [20]23, against Jewish Australians. All the way through [20]24 until when it pivoted to direct targeting of people, businesses, and places of worship in October [20]24.”

The national terrorism risk remains at the “upper end of probable” in the aftermath of the Bondi terror attack, Burgess told the royal commission.

He said the “temperature is higher” than when the threat level was raised to probable in 2024, which means a greater than 50% chance someone will plan to undertake an act of terror.

In the current security environment, Burgess said there was a “concerning trajectory, as in it’s getting hotter”.

“There is more permission for violence, and an environment where people can go to violence with little or no warning means we’re on the upper end of probable. The next level up is expected. But in the current system, that requires us to have specific intelligence that there is a plan and a location for an act of terror.”