PDP chieftain Akinloye Oyeniyi questions Oyo government’s process, says installation without presence breaks tradition despite legal backing.
- +Akinloye Oyeniyi: Installation of Ibadan Obas in Absentia Unprecedented
The South-West Zonal Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Akinloye Oyeniyi, has described the installation of newly elevated Ibadan traditional rulers in their absence as unprecedented, raising concerns over the process adopted by the Oyo State government.
The South-West Zonal Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Akinloye Oyeniyi, has described the installation of newly elevated Ibadan traditional rulers in their absence as unprecedented, raising concerns over the process adopted by the Oyo State government.
Speaking during an interview on ARISE News on Monday, Oyeniyi acknowledged that while the state government has the legal authority to install traditional rulers, the manner in which the recent ceremony was conducted departs from established norms.
“The installation of traditional rulers is within the legal jurisdiction of the state government. However, installing someone in their absence is unprecedented,” he said.
He noted that key elements of the coronation process were missing, including the presentation of the staff of office and the formal crowning of the monarchs.
“No staff of office was given, and no crowns were placed on their heads,” he stated.
According to him, the situation becomes more contentious given that the affected chiefs had reportedly requested a delay, yet the government proceeded with the ceremony.
Oyeniyi suggested that the timing of the installation may not be entirely coincidental, pointing to emerging political developments in the state.
“These positions have been sought for a long time, and the state government only acted recently following rumors of a potential APC candidacy,” he said.
On whether the development signals a breakdown in relations between Seyi Makinde and the Olubadan of Ibadan, Oyeniyi said although both parties have denied any rift, the circumstances suggest otherwise.
“The government’s decision to proceed without the Olubadan’s presence… suggests otherwise,” he noted.
He emphasized that the presence of other chiefs does not substitute for the authority of the Olubadan in such ceremonies.
“The presence of the Balogun doesn’t equate to the Olubadan’s approval,” he added.
Despite the controversy, Oyeniyi downplayed concerns that the situation could destabilize the state, stressing that constitutional provisions remain the ultimate guide.
“It doesn’t necessarily pose a risk to stability… the 1999 Constitution is supreme,” he said.
He explained that holding a traditional title does not automatically preclude individuals from pursuing political ambitions, provided constitutional requirements are met.
Addressing claims that the controversy is exaggerated, Oyeniyi insisted that both the political undertones and procedural lapses make it a serious issue.
“The issue is twofold: the political undertones and the improper manner of the coronation,” he stated.
He further criticized the ceremony, describing it as lacking formality and proper structure.
“It was more of a ‘jamboree’… you can’t force an installation on someone who isn’t ready,” he said.
On calls for reform, Oyeniyi maintained that existing frameworks are sufficient but must always align with constitutional provisions.
“Any traditional laws or actions must align with the Constitution,” he emphasized.
Oyeniyi’s remarks underscore concerns over due process in traditional leadership matters, suggesting that while legality may be intact, legitimacy depends on adherence to established customs and procedures.
